Model behaviour: A systems approach to alcohol-related harm
Project title: Simulation modelling of alcohol consumption and the effectiveness of harm-reduction policies
This project is finished. Click on the image to read the Findings Brief.
What is dynamic simulation modelling? Watch an explainer video here.
What is the issue?
Excessive alcohol consumption causes harm across society, from the effects of binge drinking, including alcohol poisoning, violence and road traffic accidents, to long-term high overall alcohol consumption which contributes to chronic health problems, including heart disease, cancer and stroke.
There are many ways to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, including increasing taxes on alcohol sales, restricting hours of sales, drink driving regulation, and education and social marketing.
However, alcohol-related harm is a complex problem, with many inter-related causes, so we needed to explore what combination of interventions is likely to produce maximum community-wide impact.
How did the project address the issue?
The Prevention Centre developed a simulation model of alcohol use in NSW that could be used to forecast the effectiveness of a variety of approaches to reducing alcohol-related harm, both individually and in combination. The model addressed both binge drinking and high average consumption that leads to chronic disease.
Simulation modelling brings together a variety of evidence sources, such as research, expert knowledge, practice experience and data, to capture the complexity of a problem. That model is then used to simulate various policy scenarios to see which is likely to have the most effect.
The key steps of the project were to:
- Compile research on the causes of the problem and the intervention options.
- Bring together a small group of policy makers, researchers, practitioners and other to collaboratively build the model, drawing on research evidence, their expert knowledge and data.
- Test and validate the model.
- Examine the effectiveness of alternative policy options to inform policy design and facilitate broader consensus for action to address the problem.
What were the outcomes?
The project produced a decision support tool that allows policy makers and other stakeholders to explore the impact of a broad range of potential intervention scenarios over time.
Other outcomes of this project were:
- It collaboratively brought together many valuable sources of information in a systematic way to produce a practical tool that policy makers can use to guide their decisions on how best to address the complex problem of alcohol-related harms.
- The process enhanced appreciation of the value of modelling for informing policy and practice.
Relevance for practice
Excessive alcohol consumption is a cause of chronic health problems and Prevention Centre partners have confirmed that alcohol policy is of interest.
The model explored which combinations of interventions will have the greatest impact for dollars spent when addressing both binge drinking and long-term high average alcohol consumption, informing policy decisions about alcohol-related harm.
Project start date: April 2014
Project end date: June 2016
- Dr Jo-An Atkinson, Prevention Centre
- Jaithri Ananthapavan, Deakin University
- Dylan Knowles, Minus Fifty Software
- Dr Ante Prodan, Prevention Centre, Western Sydney University
- Dr Jo Mitchell, Centre for Population Health, NSW Ministry of Health
- Dr Geoff McDonnell, Prevention Centre
- Mark Heffernan, Prevention Centre, Dynamic Operations
- Professor Sally Redman, Sax Institute
- Adjunct Professor Lucie Rychetnik, Sax Institute
- Professor Alan Shiell, La Trobe University
- Professor John Wiggers, University of Newcastle
- Associate Professor Sonia Wutze, Prevention Centre
This project was funded by the NHMRC, Australian Government Department of Health, NSW Ministry of Health, ACT Health and the HCF Research Foundation.
This project has now been completed.The model simulated a large range of possible combinations of interventions. Several findings are of particular interest:
- Combining different interventions has unanticipated, synergistic effects. For example, combining a policy of 3 am licensed venue closing time plus 1 am lockout with an expansion of treatment service coverage to 20% of heavy drinkers suggested a 33% reduction in acute alcohol-related harms. This population impact was greater than the sum of each policy modelled individually. This understanding will help policy makers to develop suites of interventions within the constraints of limited government resources.
- Some interventions can have unintended consequences. For example, when we tested the impact of raising drink prices in licensed venues, the model unexpectedly showed an increase in consumption and violence. This is because individuals in the model shifted their behaviour to drinking more at home parties or ‘preloading’ due to the higher prices in pubs and clubs.
- With sustained investment, the effect of interventions can grow stronger over time – though the full impacts may not be seen within a policy cycle.
- Atkinson JA, Prodan A, Livingston M, Knowles D, O’Donnell, Room R, Indig D, Page A, McDonnell G, Wiggers J. Impacts of licensed premises trading hour policies on alcohol-related harms. Addiction. 2018; doi: 10.1111/add.14178. [Epub ahead of print]
- Atkinson JA, Knowles D, Wiggers J, et al. Harnessing advances in computer simulation to inform policy and planning to reduce alcohol-related harms. Int J Public Health. 2017; epub before print. doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1041-y
- Atkinson J, O’Donnell E, Wiggers J, McDonnell G, Mitchell J, Freebairn L, Indig D, Rychetnik L. Dynamic simulation modelling of policy responses to reduce alcohol-related harms: rationale and procedure for a participatory approach. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(1):e2711707
- Freebairn L, Rychetnik L, Atkinson J, Kelly P, McDonnell G, Roberts N, Whittall C, Redman S. Knowledge mobilisation for policy development: implementing systems approaches through participatory dynamic simulation modelling. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:83 doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0245-1
- O’Donnell E, Atkinson JA, Freebairn L, Rychetnik L. Participatory simulation modelling to inform public health policy and practice: Rethinking the evidence hierarchies. J Public Health Policy. 2017;May;38(2):203–215. doi: 10.1057/s41271-016-0061-9.
- Atkinson J and Page A. Dynamic simulation modelling to inform strategic planning for prevention of alcohol-related harms and suicide. Intelligent Decision Support Systems in Healthcare symposium. 21 June 2016. Sydney
- O’Donnell E. Dynamic simulation modelling: Supporting decisions to reduce alcohol-related harms in NSW. Emerging Health Policy Research Conference. Menzies Centre for Health Policy. Sydney. July 2016.
- Knowles D, Prodan A, McDonnell G, Atkinson A. Developing decision support tools in partnership with State Health Departments to inform prevention policy. AnyLogic Conference. 16 November 2016. Nashville, US.
- Prevention Centre news, November 2016: Dynamic simulation modelling sheds light on effective alcohol harm reduction approaches
- The Mandarin, November 2016: Introducing NSW liquor controls state-wide could reduce acute alcohol harms by 20%
- Prevention Centre news, August 2015: Hands-on modelling workshop tackles complexity of alcohol misuse
- Prevention Centre blog: Dr Jo-An Atkinson, What-if tool explores complex problems