Skip to content
Home page - The Prevention Centre

Primary menu

  • About us
    • Our vision and mission
    • Our approach
    • Our partners
    • Our structure and governance
  • About prevention
    • What is prevention?
    • What are the benefits of prevention for health and wellbeing?
    • What is the burden of chronic disease?
    • What are the economic benefits of prevention?
    • What are the co-benefits of prevention?
  • Our people
  • Our work
    • Research projects
    • Knowledge syntheses
    • Systems thinking
    • Dynamic simulation modelling
    • Collaboration for Enhanced Research Impact (CERI)
  • Our impact
    • Research impact
  • Resource hub
  • Events
  • News
  • Engage with us
    • The Chronicle newsletter
    • Emerging Leaders Network
    • Communities of practice
    • Work or study with us
    • Contact us
Search
What are you looking for?

You can search across all our content by topic, methodology and content type.

    Home > Resource hub > Knowledge mobilisation framework

Knowledge mobilisation framework

How to use knowledge mobilisation to enhance research impact. Learn strategies such as taking a systems approach, and download useful tools.

Page contents

  • What is knowledge mobilisation?
  • A systems approach to knowledge mobilisation
  • Developing a knowledge mobilisation plan
  • Further reading

What is knowledge mobilisation?

Knowledge mobilisation describes how knowledge is created and used to inform policy and practice. It is defined in literally hundreds of ways in the literature. At the Prevention Centre, we define it as the overarching process of moving knowledge to create and enhance research impact into policy and practice.

Knowledge mobilisation is a relatively new term that comes from the implementation science literature. There are many different definitions; however, most of these centre around making academic research accessible through a deliberative approach to creating purposeful connections between the researcher and the research user, with the goal of improving the quality of the research itself and making it more likely to be used in public policy and professional practice.

‘Mobilising’ implies a social interaction and involves an iterative process of co-creation of knowledge through a collaborative process i.e. knowledge mobilisation offers an approach to improving the usefulness of research through making research outcomes more accessible to non-academic audiences. We also recognise that context is important, and that research itself is improved when informed by the knowledge and experience drawn from applied policy and practice settings.

Many knowledge mobilisation strategies are similar to communications strategies. Communications involves developing the strategy, channels and tools to transfer knowledge. Communications is an integral tool of knowledge mobilisation.

Knowledge mobilisation strategies

Knowledge mobilisation can incorporate many different strategies. These can include: implementation, dissemination, networking, brokering, co-production, advocacy, exchange and integration,

Knowledge mobilisation strategies are best applied right from the start of the research – such as refining the research question to ensure relevance for end-users, and using co-production. However, knowledge mobilisation can be used at any stage throughout the research process.

Each strategy should be carefully chosen to suit the situation at hand. An analysis of the system with which the knowledge is attempting to interact can be beneficial in determining the best strategy. Taking a systems thinking approach can help to determine who may hold the roles and power in the system and how to leverage these for the knowledge mobilisation process.

Knowledge mobilisation can incorporate many different strategies. The eight strategies pictured are: Integration, Exchange, Advocacy, Co-production, Brokering, Networking, Dissemination and Implementation.

A systems approach to knowledge mobilisation

In the literature, linear models describing knowledge transfer and translation have moved towards multi-directional approaches that take into account the complexity of the systems we are trying to influence.

A systems approach to knowledge mobilisation is where knowledge is produced and becomes meaningful through social processes.

Haynes et al have found that using systems thinking can enhance and fundamentally transform knowledge mobilisation. Previous literature suggests six key areas or leverage points to target when applying a systems approach to organisational change.

Leverage points for changing complex systems

This pyramid diagram includes six suggested areas to target. The area at the bottom has the least effectiveness but the most accessibility, and vice versa at the top level.

These leverage points in a system are conceptualised as a hierarchical framework in which change is harder to achieve at the upper levels but, if successful, is likely to be more transformational. Leverage points in the lower levels are needed to target upper-level levers.

Understanding the system within which your research sits and how and where you are trying to influence is a key step to developing targeted knowledge mobilisation strategies.

Leverage points for changing complex systems. A pyramid diagram including six suggested areas to target: from bottom to top they are ‘Actors and elements of the systems, including practices and resources’, ‘Feedback’, ‘Relationships and power’, ‘Structure and rules’, ‘Goals’ and ‘Paradigm’. The area at the bottom has the least effectiveness but the most accessibility, and vice versa at the top level.

Developing a knowledge mobilisation systems mindset

The Prevention Centre has synthesised a series of targeted questions from the literature. These 13 questions are designed to create a ‘guide’ for systems thinking in knowledge mobilisation and develop thought processes conducive to further developing knowledge mobilisation plans.

We suggest you reflect on these questions before you start your research, or shortly after it has started. You can keep coming back to them during the research process as a reflective process during this time.

Planning knowledge mobilisation within a system

This guide is based on the hierarchy of leverage points above and give practical points to reflect on. These ‘questions’ do not necessarily need written answers, but it can be something you use to reflect on with your research team and decide which leverage points are most applicable to your research and where you may focus your energy and efforts.

Developing a knowledge mobilisation plan

At the Prevention Centre, we have adapted eight key archetypes of practice in knowledge mobilisation identified by Davies et al. These were developed from a large body of empirical work on mapping knowledge mobilisation within healthcare.

Use these archetypes to reflect on your work, as a method to develop knowledge mobilisation planning. Firstly, what is happening now under each archetype for your project? And secondly, what are the future plans?

Your projects may not have something to document for all the archetypes. There is no right or wrong – the archetypes describe the breadth of knowledge mobilisation activities, not best methods for your context.

Reflect on these against the systems thinking guide that you have just completed. How can you effectively use these strategies to mobilise the research knowledge you are creating?

Knowledge archetypes

  • Producing knowledge

    Production of research-based knowledge and ‘products’: explicit knowledge, reviews, research summaries, web portals, collation and synthesis etc. Explicit, codified, theoretical, empirical knowledge production and dissemination. Knowledge driven problem solving, aimed at practitioners, managers and policy makers.
  • Brokering own research

    Brokering own research to policy makers/practitioners. Interactive and relational models for research use, emphasised by how agencies seek to share research. Create interactive spaces where knowledge and expertise can interact. Focus on brokering new knowledge and flow of new research. Mostly push but includes some relationship models.
  • Brokering wider research

    Brokering wider research to policy makers/practitioners. Interactive and relational models as in B, but focus is on brokering wider bodies of research on a given issue. Working with ‘stocks’ of existing research-based knowledge. Informed by ‘linkage and exchange’. Mechanisms: dissemination, training and education, interaction. Researchers and policy makers seen as central.
  • Advocating for use of evidence

    Proselytisers for an evidence-informed world. Promote for a greater role for research-based knowledge and seek the necessary infrastructural, organisational and cultural change needed to make this happen in an effort to address the issue of knowledge application being heavily contextual, problem driven and socially situated. Interaction is central. Mechanisms: training, education, interaction, social influence, incentives, reinforcements.
  • Research into practice

    Facilitating implementation of instrumental evidence by helping organisations with the change management process. Improving practice through the application of research knowledge from outside the organisation where change is being sought. Mechanisms: dissemination, interaction, social influence, facilitation, incentives, reinforcements. Includes relationship models with some systems models.
  • Researching in practice

    Research and implementation done simultaneously. Support for local implementation, but a focus on local learning, absorptive capacity development, co-produced research knowledge and bringing together all stakeholders. Mechanisms: interaction, social influence, facilitation, incentives and reinforcements. Shaping a wide range of outcomes, includes relational and systems models.
  • Fostering networks

    Create, develop or mould collaborations and networks that shape and share expertise, increase the role that research-based knowledge plays a role in these networks. Uses knowledge from within and externally to the organisation. Mechanisms: production, dissemination, training and education, interaction, social influence, facilitation. Uses relationship models.
  • Advancing the field

    Knowledge mobilisation is not yet under-pinned by a coherent body of theorising or extensive empirical evaluation. This refines the field, building shared understanding and committing to further empirical study. Application of ‘knowledge about knowing’. Mechanisms: production, dissemination, incentive and reinforcements. For enlightenment and conceptual use. Researchers as central. Emphasis on external context.

Knowledge mobilisation checklist

The knowledge mobilisation checklist can then be used as a checklist to focus the knowledge mobilisation strategies within this system, if needed.

Download checklist [Micrsoft Word]

A useful undertaking at this time is stakeholder mapping. See how you are involving stakeholders in the research process and how you can target them with communications strategies (See User Guide chapter on how to write a communications plan).

Further reading

  • Developing a systems thinking guide for enhancing knowledge mobilisation in prevention research

  • Applying systems thinking to knowledge mobilisation in public health

  • Knowledge mobilisation in practice: an evaluation of The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre

  • Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors – a multimethod mapping study

Thank you to Dr Michelle Irving for development of this framework.

Key archetypes of practice in knowledge mobilisation adapted from Davies HT, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors – a multimethod mapping study. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2015;3(27).

More from the CERI User Guide

This chapter of the User Guide is one in a series available from The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre website. It was prepared by members of the Collaboration for Enhanced Research Impact (CERI) Coordinating Group to provide practical tips on knowledge mobilisation and science communication for researchers working in the prevention of chronic disease.

CERI User Guide
A desk with pen and paper, laptop and mug. Photo by Oli Dale on Unsplash

About CERI

The Collaboration for Enhanced Research Impact (CERI) is a joint initiative between the Prevention Centre and several NHMRC Centres of Research Excellence, established in June 2020 to enhance the profile and impact of chronic disease prevention in Australia. We are working together to find alignment in the policy and practice implications of our work and to develop shared communications across our various projects and participating centres.

Read more about CERI
CERI develop shared communication across research projects and participating centres.
Details

DATE 29 Nov 2022

TYPE Reports

Prevention experts

  • Helen Signy

    The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre
    headshot of Helen Signy

Prevention methodologies

  • Research impact and translation ,
SHARE
TweetLinkedInFacebookEmail

More resources

  • Writing in plain English

    Resource category: Reports Reports
    Date 01 Feb 2023
  • Writing an opinion piece

    Resource category: Reports Reports
    Date 01 Feb 2023
  • Policy Development Handbook

    Resource category: Reports Reports
    Date 22 Dec 2022

Acknowledgement of Country

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Australians and Traditional Custodians of the lands where we live, learn, and work.

Newsletter sign-up

Newsletter

Follow the Prevention Centre

Follow us

  • TwitterTwitter
  • LinkedinLinkedin
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • PodcastPodcast

Funding Partners

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre is funded by the NHMRC, Australian Government Department of Health, ACT Health, Cancer Council Australia, NSW Ministry of Health, Wellbeing SA, Tasmanian Department of Health, and VicHealth. The Australian Government also contributed through the Medical Research Future Fund. Queensland Health became a financial contributor in 2022. The Prevention Centre is administered by the Sax Institute.

©2023 The Sax Institute.

Footer Navigation

  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Sitemap

BROWSER NOT SUPPORTED

It seems you’re using a browser that we no longer support, so this site might not function as expected.

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge to visit this website.

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!