How to fund prevention delivery
Project title: Resources and funding models for prevention
Start date: July 2019
Estimated end date: December 2021
What is the issue?
Resources are what individuals and communities draw on to improve their quality of life. These can include traditional economic resources, such as capital, infrastructure and materials, and also non-material resources such as community narratives, culture, and self and collective efficacy. Resources pre-exist in communities. But they are also developed (or hampered) by health funding processes.
Building on some earlier work with NSW Health and a project in Tasmania, this project is an examination of the mechanisms for prevention funding at local, state and national levels and the consequences for building prevention capacity. We hope to gain insights to (1) help predict how to adjust prevention funding formulas to local contexts; and (2) appreciate why some ways of funding preventive programs may be counter-productive.
How is the project addressing the issue?
We are conducting literature searches and conducting interviews with bureaucrats and policy makers to collate and describe different funding models and review their implications. We are interviewing holders of project grants in health promotion and conducting analyses of grant funding panel discussions.
Relevance for policy and practice
We will expand understandings of resources that goes beyond paid staff, materials, training and venue costs. The benefit of long-term capacity building for prevention will be more clearly elucidated, along with the types of funding processes that sustain it.
What are the expected outcomes?
Ultimately, we will offer a new concept of resources that goes beyond current understandings about paid staff, materials, training and venue costs. This will help us suggest how we might eventually put an economic value on currently ‘hidden’ resources in communities.
We will help practitioners and policy partners to better appreciate ‘true’ local costs when external programs are introduced. Policy partners will be in a better position to select and combine different prevention funding options.
Professor Penny Hawe, University of Sydney
Professor Alan Shiell, La Trobe University
Kate Garvey, Department of Health, Tasmania
Dr Shane Kavanagh, La Trobe University
Dr Victoria Loblay, University of Sydney
This project is funded by the NHMRC, Australian Government Department of Health, ACT Health, Cancer Council Australia, NSW Ministry of Health, South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing, Tasmanian Department of Health, and VicHealth.
- Kavanagh S, Shiell A, Hawe P, Garvey K. Resources, relationships, and systems thinking should inform the way community health promotion is funded. Critical Public Health. 2020 Aug 27. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2020.1813255
- Loblay V, Conte KP, Grøn S, Green A, Innes-Hughes C, Persson L, Williams M, and Hawe P. ‘Old’ tools in a new era: Unpacking the roles of promotional and informational resources in scaled-up preventive interventions. Critical Public Health. 2020. 1-12. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2020.1849563
- Lobley V. New roles for old tools: program resource tools as objects of value in the practice of health promotion. The Australian Anthropological Society Annual Conference, Canberra, 3 December 2019
- Lobley V. Panellist, What do they value? Anthropological perspectives on health-related professions.The Australian Anthropological Society Annual Conference, Canberra, 3 December 2019